Generative AI is no longer a distant experiment. It is already shaping how Canadian companies analyse data, communicate with stakeholders, design products and manage routine work. For directors, this is both a strategic opportunity and a new source of governance risk.
Boards that treat generative AI as a passing trend risk falling behind competitors that move faster and with more discipline. At the same time, rapid adoption without guardrails can expose organisations to privacy breaches, regulatory scrutiny and reputational damage. This article outlines what Canadian directors need to know about generative AI, the key risks and opportunities, and the practical next steps for effective board oversight.
Why generative AI is now a board issue in Canada
Canadian organisations face the same global pressures that push AI up the board agenda. Margin pressure, scarce talent, complex regulation and demanding stakeholders all create incentives to automate and augment knowledge work. At the same time, Canada is moving toward a more formal AI regulatory regime that will expect boards to understand and manage AI risks.
Generative AI matters for Canadian directors because it:
-
Changes how management makes decisions and prepares information for the board.
-
Touches sensitive data, including customer, employee and transaction information.
-
Can influence markets, disclosures and investor communications.
-
Sits squarely within emerging expectations for technology and cyber oversight at the board level.
Opportunity map for Canadian directors
Used responsibly, generative AI can support better governance and stronger performance. Directors can encourage management to pilot AI in areas where the benefits are clear and the risks are manageable.
Examples include:
-
Decision support for the board. Drafting board papers, summarising long reports and highlighting key trends so directors can focus on judgement, not formatting.
-
Scenario planning and strategy. Analysing macro trends, policy scenarios and competitor moves to support strategy discussions, while keeping human oversight on final conclusions.
-
Operational efficiency in governance. Automating minutes, meeting summaries, policy comparisons and policy drafting to free the corporate secretariat for higher value work.
-
Stakeholder communication. Assisting with first drafts of shareholder letters, internal FAQs and regulatory briefing notes, with careful review by management and legal teams.
International frameworks such as the OECD AI Principles emphasise trustworthy, human centred AI that is transparent, fair and accountable. Aligning early with these principles can help Canadian boards future proof their AI strategy and demonstrate responsible leadership.
The risk landscape you cannot ignore
Generative AI can fail in ways that are different from traditional software. Directors should expect management to move beyond one page talking points and bring a clear view of concrete risks and mitigations.
Key risk areas include:
-
Privacy and data protection. Many AI tools train on or process personal data. Canadian organisations remain subject to federal and provincial privacy laws, and the proposed Artificial Intelligence and Data Act would add AI specific requirements once in force.
-
Cybersecurity and data leakage. Staff who paste confidential information into public AI tools may inadvertently disclose trade secrets, deal terms or personal data. Even internal models can be misconfigured or accessed by unauthorised users.
-
Accuracy, bias and explainability. Generative AI can produce confident but wrong outputs, or embed bias from underlying data. That exposes companies to litigation, regulatory action and ESG criticism if decisions are not explainable.
-
Intellectual property and content rights. Using AI generated content without understanding training data, licences or model terms can create copyright and ownership disputes.
-
Regulatory and disclosure risk. Canadian regulators are already signalling higher expectations around AI use. The Canadian Securities Administrators have issued guidance on how existing securities laws apply to AI in capital markets, with a clear focus on governance, model risk management and transparency.
Recent analysis of the AI regulatory landscape in Canada notes that there is still no single AI statute in force, yet organisations are already expected to comply with privacy, human rights and sector specific rules while preparing for the proposed Artificial Intelligence and Data Act.
An evolving Canadian regulatory environment
For now, Canadian organisations operate in a patchwork environment. There is no comprehensive AI law in force, but there are clear signals about the direction of travel.
-
The federal government has proposed the Artificial Intelligence and Data Act, which aims to regulate high impact AI systems and impose obligations related to risk management, transparency and incident reporting.
-
Existing privacy laws, including federal and provincial legislation, continue to apply to AI systems that use personal data.
-
Securities regulators are publishing guidance on AI use in capital markets and emphasise that technology neutral laws still apply to AI supported activities.
For directors, the implication is simple. You cannot wait for a final rulebook before acting. Boards should treat AI as part of core risk and governance frameworks today, while staying close to developments in Ottawa and across provincial regulators.
Authoritative overviews of the current Canadian AI regime, such as recent legal commentary on the state of AI regulation and the Canadian Securities Administrators notice on AI in capital markets, can help directors understand how fast expectations are shifting.
What good oversight looks like in the boardroom
Generative AI sits at the intersection of strategy, technology, risk and culture. That makes it a board issue, not just an IT issue.
Effective board oversight typically includes:
-
Clear accountability. Confirm which committee owns primary oversight of AI risk and how it coordinates with the full board.
-
An AI inventory. Ask management to map where AI and generative AI are already in use, which vendors are involved and which data sets are touched.
-
A risk based framework. Ensure the organisation applies stronger controls to higher impact use cases, such as customer decisioning, pricing or automated content that could influence markets.
-
Skills and education. Provide training for directors on AI basics, bring in external experts when needed and consider whether the board has enough technology fluency.
-
Culture and ethics. Set expectations on responsible AI use, including guidelines for staff use of public tools and channels for raising concerns.
Board collaboration platforms, including solutions such as board-room, can help centralise AI policies, risk reports and training materials so directors work from a single source of truth.
Practical next steps for Canadian directors
Boards do not need perfect technical knowledge to act now. They do need a structured agenda and a clear set of questions for management.
Practical next steps include:
-
Put generative AI on the board agenda. Request a briefing from management that covers current uses, planned pilots and key risks.
-
Set guiding principles. Align with trustworthy AI concepts such as accountability, transparency, fairness and human oversight, and embed these in governance policies.
-
Update risk and control frameworks. Integrate AI into enterprise risk management, cyber defences, vendor due diligence and internal audit plans.
-
Review data and privacy practices. Confirm how personal and sensitive data is used in AI systems, where it is stored and which safeguards apply.
-
Plan for disclosure and stakeholder communication. Consider how AI use may need to be reflected in risk disclosures, MD&A, ESG reporting and employee communication.
-
Monitor the regulatory horizon. Ask management and external counsel to provide periodic updates on the Artificial Intelligence and Data Act and related guidance from Canadian regulators.
Handled thoughtfully, generative AI can become a source of strategic advantage for Canadian companies rather than a compliance headache. Directors who engage early, ask practical questions and insist on disciplined governance will be better placed to protect long term value for shareholders and stakeholders alike.